Showing posts with label Richards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Richards. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

2 Minutes for Improper Mouthguard Use

                                                                                      Get in the penalty box…

"But none of the other guys actually have their
mouthguards in their mouths
"
-Martin St Louis
Photo Credit
Anyone who has watched and/or played hockey, you know 99.9% of the players have mouthguards. Whether they actually use them properly, is another question.

I’m not sure why, but guys earn extra swoon points when I catch them chewing on their mouthguard.  I often find myself the victim of a blank stare, and possibly some drooling, when they pan the bench during a game and I see a player improperly using this device.  While I understand the boredom one may experience on the bench during shifts and the incessant need to chew on something, what I don’t get is how they do that while skating?  I'd be afraid of losing a chiclet or two.

What I also find intriguing is the logos on the mouth pieces. Especially yellow logos on the front of the mouth guard. Honestly, I do a double take each time I see it thinking the player has ungodly yellow coloured teeth. I, personally, would be all for a blinged out sparkly mouthpiece.

Here are some of the biggest offenders:



John-Michael Liles (or #JML as I like to call him):

Sweet fancy moses... once you get past the blue eyes (I'll give you a moment.....) watching him chomp down on his mouthguard... Need another moment?


Mouthguards need to be in the
mouth to be functional, #JML

Photo Credit

Mark Stuart:

Good gravy, this calls for not one, but TWO photos. Just cause he's that awesome.

Photo Credit

Wearing your mouthguard
properly is so overrated.

Photo Credit
Jeff Woywitka:

Yet another one that beckons multiple photographical proof.  
Bonus Swoon points for the cele
mouthguard chomp.

Photo Credit
Bad Ass
Photo Credit
Another cele mouthguard!
Photo Credit
Sweetfancymoses
Photo Credit






















Stu Bickel:

Sadly, his antics have only been caught on TV. I have no photographical proof. Well, at least not until I saw this. 
Prepare yourselves. There are not one, but TWO mouthguard infractions here. See if you can find 'em.

Tortorella and Rangers Bench Watch a Distinct Kicking Motion
Bickel AND Woywitka with the infractions. Two minutes boys... Photo Credit

Alex Ovechkin:
Now, I find A-Ovary to be hideous. But give the guy props for playing with his mouthguard not in its proper place. Kinda takes some talent.

Ovechkin Looks Over Girardi
"In former Soviet Russia, we chew on guard of mouth as we stare at Girardi."
Photo Credit: Flickr



Brad Richards:
While he's not big on the chewing, he does sport an UnderArmour mouthguard that has made me take several double takes.  Now, he doesn't really need to draw more attention to his large teeth, so I'm perplexed about why he would choose a mouthguard that does just that.  I couldn't find a photo of his yellow one, which almost gave me a minor bout of cardiac arrest, but I did find this snazzy blue one.

" 'scuse me, Mr Richards? You got somethin' on your teeth..."
Photo Credit

My bad... no sooner did I type that I could not find a photo of said yellow mouthpiece when GoogleImages surprised me with this gem:

Not sure if the scowl is because he played for
Dallas, or if he's trying to scare off a defender
with the glow of his yellow teeth?

Photo Credit

Seriously boys, keep your chiclets safe. Wear your mouthguard properly.
Because, frankly, this is scary....
Photo Credit





Friday, February 10, 2012

It's The End Of The World As We Know It....

...and I feel fine...

Last night, there were 3 things that happened that now have me convinced that the Rapture just may be coming. Let's take a look:

I scored on the power play! Whoooooo!!!!!Photo Credit: BSU
First, and make sure you're sitting down folks, The Rangers scored in the 2nd period.  Not a big deal, right? WRONG. They didn't just score, they scored on the POWER PLAY.  See, aren't you glad you sat down? Twas a sweet tip in from Callahan that made it's way past Matthieu Garon.  It clearly sparked the Rangers' game and gave them a sense of hope. This also started the chain of events that led me to believe that the rapture is, in fact, coming.




"Hey Guys, I just scored my first goal in 368 days... No big deal..."PhotoCredit: NYI
Second was something that has nothing, or very little to do with the Rangers. Yes folks, Scott Gomez scored. On the ice, just in case that needed clarification.  Gomez had gone 368 LONG days without scoring a goal.  Last night in the 3rd period against the Islanders, Gomez lit the lamp against Nabokov. Normally, that's not something so odd or unusual to score against the Islanders, but maybe they felt bad for him and since they were eventually going to lose the game, they took pity on Gomez? Either way, he scored. The Rapture is coming.



When in doubt - hug it out!
Photo Credit: BSU
Then, apparently the #RichardsMunnEffect peters off after a few weeks. Richards broke his silence on the scoreboard netting his long-awaited 17th goal of the season in the OT to win the game. Apparently he got a GPS to find the net after admitting he was a little 'lost' to the media this week.  I hope it's a Garmin, my TomTom isn't very good - always sends me the long route. It was nice to see the whole bench clear to celebrate with him, thankfully, Anisimov left his rifle on the bench. We didn't need a repeat of what happened the last time the Rangers played the Lightning.

So, now grab all your non-perishables and hide in your basement. The Rapture is now headed here... I just hope we get to the playoffs first.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

The Battle Of The Hudson Wasn't Really A Battle, Per Se...

The game last night against the Devils was a hard fought game.  The Rangers had some low points and some high points to the game. Am I happy that they lost? No. But these things happen folks...

You can blame it on the officiating, the fact that Richards isn't scoring, Eminger should have dressed in lieu of Bickel or even that McDonagh hasn't registered a point in the past 6 games.  But it's not any of those. The Rangers played a sloppy game. The power play, or lack there of, had 3 chances to capitalize. THREE. But yet again, the power play was ineffective.

There were good scoring chances where the Rangers just couldn't bury the puck. Prust had a good chance to get a shot on goal and shanked it.  As much as the Rangers fans poke fun at Brodeur's weight, you have to give credit to the guy. He's still a good goalie.  Hagelin, again, shows why he's in the lineup. His speed draws penalties.  But it may almost be a moot point if the Rangers can't get the PP working. He also managed to get 4 of the teams 15 shots on goal. Boyle also was good on the face offs - winning 16. Lundqvist, despite taking the loss, was quite good between the pipes, not stellar.  But he also did what he could, aside from scoring goals.

When in doubt, crash the net. Just don't touch the goalie.
Photo Credit: BSU
Then there was the goal, which turned out to be a no-goal.  You could see that Gaborik made an effort of stopping (notice the spray of ice from his skates), but it was ruled that he 'ran' the goalie. You can argue til the cows come home about the goalie interference call on Gaborik as he was pushed into Brodeur, and how the goal should stand... but in all reality, would that mean that the Rangers would have won?

Probably not. They were outplayed most of the game, so going to an overtime and potentially a shoot out, would not really be to their advantage.

So Rangers fans, calm down. It's one game. The NYR are still at the top of the Eastern conference. Take a deep breath and move on.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

It's Not The End Of The World, Folks...

In case you live under a rock or something, you may not have heard that Olivia Munn and Brad Richards have parted ways.

People are now worried Richards will slide into a tailspin of not producing on the ice. That he will become a useless player, destined to be reunited with his good buddy Avery on the bench in Hartford.

Seriously people, Olivia Munn had about as much to do with the Rangers as I do.



Moving on...

Monday, December 19, 2011

12 Days of Rangers - Day 9

On the 9th day of the Hottest Rangers, I give to thee...

Bradley 'Rabbit' Richards
Photo Credit: GettyImages

Ok, so I made up that nickname, but honestly, it kinda fits. He's fast, has big teeth, and I'm sure he probably enjoys a carrot or two.

This is one of two that I am uber excited to do. Frankly, cause I've swooned many a time over Mr Richards... So be prepared.... there are quite a few photos...

Photo Credit: LisaGansky Photography

Photo Credit: MSG

Found here via GoogleImages


Photo Credit: Charles Wenzleberg/NYPost

Photo found here via GoogleImages




Sunday, December 4, 2011

Is It Too Early To Plan The Parade?

With the Rangers now with a winning streak in the month of December, we can now start planning the parade, eh?

Miracle on 34th St?

The Rangers have proved that they are capable of stringing together wins, no matter how ugly the win.  The team is starting to show chemistry that is not only evident in the top 2 lines, but has trickled down to the 3rd line.  With the Rangers have 3 lines clicking, things are starting to flow for the team. Guys like Sean Avery (mark this on your calendars, folks, this is the second time I mention how impressed I am of him. Especially you, @TheNYRBlog!), have shown that they can contribute to the team.  Avery has impressed me as of lately (gasp!) with his smart play (double gasp!) and ability to draw a penalty or two.  Avery also earned bonus points for netting 3 goals in the 12 games since he’s been back up (triple gasp!).  Gaborik has found his legs, and has used them to help create plays and draw penalties as well.  He has also managed to rifle off 95 shots on goal.  Impressive. Richards is showing why he was so sought after this past off-season, leading the team with 22 points, making beautiful passes, creating opportunity and inspiring the young guys. Girardi has been a BEAST on D, soaking up oodles of minutes while awaiting the return of Staal.  McDonagh is an amazing +12.  Young guys Hagelin and Mitchell have made the transition to the Rangers almost seamlessly. Lundqvist and Biron, have had their ups and downs, but together they have proved to be integral parts to the team. Lundqvist and Biron have admirable save percentages so far: .932 and .930 respectively.
"I found my legs, Richie!" 
Now, with all the rainbows and unicorns out of the way, there are some “disappointing” sides to the Rangers.  One glaring one is the lackluster performance of Brandon Dubinsky.  While he has not sat a game, he has not produced as well as many have anticipated. He has one goal and 10 assists, which is a far cry from his 23goal 30 assist season of yesteryear.  There’s also the missing D-man, Marc Staal.  During the beginning of the season, reports on Staal were few and far between, and those that were given were far beyond vague.  But there has been a glimmer of hope when it was announced that Staal has begun skating. Eric Christensen showed that as quickly as you land a roster spot, you can have it yanked out from under you in record time by not playing a solid game, banking on the game going to a shoot out, and then completely failing at a shootout attempt. Sure fire way to get yourself a nice comfy seat in the press box.



Right now, the Rangers find themselves sitting in the #4 slot in the Eastern conference a little over a quarter of the way into the season. With 59 games remaining, if they continue at this pace they have the ability to make the playoffs once again.  I’ll hold off on planning the parade route. For now.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Monday, October 31, 2011

Gaborik and Richards… NHL’s Peanut Butter & Jelly

When I was younger, I loved it when my mom would make me a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.  They went well together, and plus, it was how it was supposed to be done, right?  Well, one day my mom had no jelly (insert gasp here), so I was forced to switch things up.  I scoured the fridge for a replacement. Mayonaisse? Yuck. Mustard? Yuck. Pickles? Gross.  Ham? Ew.  Etc… But hey, I attempted to find a suitable replacement rather than just give up.  So, I sucked it up and ate a peanut butter sandwich. All on its own.  And it was darn tasty. Trust me, there’s a correlation between this and Gaborik and Richards. 

The next day, my mom came home with a jar of jelly.  Now, me being the ingenious person that I am, I thought to myself “Self, if peanut butter and jelly taste good together, and peanut butter tastes good by itself, wouldn’t it stand to reason then that jelly would taste equally as good by itself?”  (I was 10 at the time and perhaps a very forward thinker. Or just really hungry. Either way, I’d consider it genius.)  So, I set upon making a jelly sandwich. And gosh darnit, wouldn’t you know, it was equally as delish as the peanut butter sandwich.  The one great combination of peanut butter and jelly could be divided into two great stand alone sandwiches.

This leads me to dynamic duo of Gaborik and Richards. (Please, don’t attempt to decipher my train of thoughts. Unless you are a qualified professional, then by all means, do so. Pro Bono, of course.)  While they look good together on paper, are they really a good match on the ice together?

Take the game from Ottawa on Saturday. Richards had some pretty nice chemistry with his new linemates, Callahan and Dubinsky.  Specifically, Richards and Callahan seem to have created some good juju between each other.  Gaborik seemed to work well with Stepan and Wolski. Richards and Gaborik each produced 3 points in that game. They each played like they are ‘expected’ to play, just not together.  They generated offense and they made things happen. There was chemistry on each of their lines.  However, on the power play, Richards and Gaborik manage to generate chemistry between each other. Mind boggling.  I was happy to see that Tortorella kept those lines pretty much intact for the next game against the San Jose Sharks.  Although the game had it weak points, those two lines were spot on. They seem more comfortable on separate lines, than on a line together. Less pressure to produce, maybe?  I’m not sure. 

Either way, they’ve proven that together they are good, but separate, they are even better. Like peanut butter and jelly.



Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Mom! We're home!

Yes.

The Rangers are back at MSG.

Tortorella's knee-jerk reaction? (hold the sarcasm on the word 'jerk' please.)

"We love what we see," said Tortorella. "But we need to win here. That's what makes a building good."

Give that man a cookie!

Richards is looking forward to butterflies.

"...I'm excited, I'm sure I'll have butterflies tomorrow. I can't wait to experience it."


I'm looking forward to seeing him in a nice blue jersey.

And if this isn't the most beautimous site ever, then I don't know what is.

Friday, October 21, 2011

Western Canadian RoadTrip: Part One

Can I get a 'hell yeah' for Lundqvist?

Outstanding in the game against Vancouver.  Must've been the sparkly new helmet.
Ooooooh. Sparkly.

Marian Gaborik seems to have returned to being the Marian Gaborik we all hoped he would be.  And by that I mean someone who scores.  Erik Christensen was invisible on the ice, Mike Rupp scored, and the Rangers had more penalty killing opportunities than power play opportunities.  Justifiably so, Lundqvist was given the first star by the New York Rangers for his part in the 4-0 shutout.

Lundqvist's performance also lead to the birth of... the Broadway Hat.  He was awarded the Broadway Hat by Brad Richards for his outstanding play in the win.

I've never wanted to be a hat so badly.  But I digress...

Moving on to the Flames.  Pretty decently played game.  The real Marian Gaborik stood up, and Ryan McDonagh went from the sacrificial goat to hero in mere minutes.  Kris Newbury stood up for Brad Richards, earning him super bonus points in my book. Prust scored one against his old team, and Tim Erixon (also known as 'Jan Erixon's son') was greeted every time he touched the puck with a resounding chorus of BOO's in B flat minor.  Oh, and the Broadway Hat made it's way to Prust.  I'm not quite sure why.  The Hat works in mysterious ways.

The Rangers have 2 more games in good ol' Canada: one Saturday against Edmonton, and one Monday against Winnipeg.  Then, the long awaited return to the fancy new MSG on October 27th against the Leafs. 

Friday, October 14, 2011

Female Hockey Fans: Why can’t a girl just like the game for the game?

I got the idea for this article after one of my recent blog posts about superstitions.  The idea also popped into my head while having a discussion via twitter with a couple other Rangers bloggers who all happen to be males.  It’s an idea that I toyed with and decided to run with.  I run slowly folks, so this could be a long run.

My story started back in September of the year 1992.  I was 13 and in 8th grade, my last year of middle school.  I probably was sporting some stretch pants with stirrups and a redonkulously oversized inside out sweatshirt. I remember my French class, there were three guys in there who all were Rangers fans, I believe.  And in traditional Michelle fashion, I tried to impress them by watching hockey.  Now, I’ll be honest, I watched my first game in the den of my house alone (it’s not as creepy as it sounds, trust me).  I couldn’t figure out why the guy wearing the C on the upper corner of his jersey had his position on his jersey. Did they do that so they made sure they played in the right spots on the ice?  Was it so the other C could keep an eye on him on the ice?  What the heck was the A for? I was convinced that centers had to stay with the other team’s center, LW with LW, etc…  I got annoyed with the TV and shut it off mid-game.  The next day, I went to my local library as we didn’t have the internets then, and checked out a book on hockey.  It would have been a hell of a lot quicker if Google existed back then… but I digress.   I read the book front to back, back to front.  It had lots of pictures.  Days later… It was then that I had a better grasp on the game, and now knew that the C on the jersey was for CAPTAIN, not CENTER.   This was also the first year I watched Olympic hockey. Being in NY, I became a Rangers fan.  Not really sure why, but I did.  By Olympics time, I had a better grasp of the game and actually enjoyed watching it.  I loved the fast-paced action, and the fights.  Oh the fights…  It was the glorious era of Jeff Beukeboom, Tie Domi, Joey Kocur…  I remember some of Beuke’s fights.  Man that guy could that guy throw a right.  Besides the fights, I loved watching Messier, Leetch, Graves and Richter on the ice.  While I wouldn’t call them poetry in motion, they were quite lovely to watch.  I remember that while I loved the game, watching the players wasn’t so bad.  I loved the energy of the game, the chasing of the puck, the speed of the skaters and the agility of the goalies.  Even watching at home, you could feel the energy at MSG through the TV.  I remember my first game at MSG, my first game at Nassau Coliseum.  Both were extremely loud.  I cried when the Rangers won the cup in 1994. I loved watching the play, and to this day, I love analyzing the PK.  I don’t know why, it just fascinates me.  I used to love when games went into OT back then.  I thought it was the cat’s pajamas to have another 20 minutes of play.  Now, I’m a big fan of the shootout. Big Fan.  Except when Erik Christensen shoots wide. But again, I digress…

I also had developed an interest in playing.  I played all during high school, ice and roller hockey. But mainly roller hockey.  I was far less graceful on ice.  I played in 2 leagues most years, and played on all-male teams.  I loved playing, loved the quickness of the game.  I watched games on TV intently.  I could dissect a PK better than most guys. It was my specialty when I played.  I could rattle off the roster, complete with jersey numbers in alphabetical order or numerical order, you decide.  It was quite marvelous.  I wasn’t big on stats, I just liked watching the game.  Occasionally, we’d meet players at autograph sessions, but I never had the idea of heading to a hotel in hopes of actually hooking up with a player. 

When guys asked me, and still do, who my favourite players are, I tell them.  If a player is remotely good looking, they assume that I like them solely based on looks.  Now, while that argument does hold some truth, it is not the sole reason why I like a player.  I like them based on their performance on the ice and off the ice (minds out of the gutter people).  I’m talking charity, giving back, being a genuine class act.  That being said, who are my favourite players, you ask?  Well, since you asked so nicely I’ll indulge you…

Brad Richards – yes, setting aside his devilish good looks, he is really a talented player.  Have you seen this man pass a puck?  It’s a thing of beauty.  I could watch video of him passing the puck for hours.  He’s a humble guy, team player, and a fantastic giver-backer. Yes, that’s the technical term.  +1 for charity!  +1 for being able to pass the puck dead on backwards!

John-Michael Liles (Toronto) – again, yes he’s good looking.  But the man is solid on D.  Solid.  A great play maker and knows when to step up and when to stay back.  Again, he’s a great community presence in the Denver and now Toronto community.  He, like Richards, did a charity event only minutes after he signed with the Leafs.  Keepin’ it classy.  Plus he’s ridiculously funny and watches “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia”. +1 for ‘hashtag JML’.  And did you catch his hair last season? SICK. Give that man another +1!

Henrik Lundqvist – No explanation needed here.  The man OWNS the net. + infinity, cause he’s Henrik Lundqvist!

And last but not least Mark Stuart (Winnipeg) – I remember watching him play while he was in Boston.  I liked his style of play.  He’s not afraid to put his body in front of the puck, and he’s not afraid to use his size and strength to win battles in the corners.  When he’s on the ice, his physical presence is felt.  He’s also an amazingly humble guy with awesomely epic taste in music. +1 for being my musicsoulmate!

Now I was curious.  Does that classify me as a girl who likes the game solely for the players’ good looks?  After several cups of coffee and bantering back and forth with myself, I came to the realization that it does not. I’ve never referred to myself, in person or on the internets as ‘Mrs Richards’ or ‘Mrs Liles’ as I’ve seen many people do.  I’ve not photoshopped myself into a photo with them.  I’ve not stalked a player outside of their hotel.  The closest I’ve come is putting someone’s number at the end of my screen name or a password.  I’ve never chased down a player to get an autograph to only slip them my number.  I have, however, joked about blindfolding Brad Richards (solely for the purpose of seeing if his passing is really that good), and kidnapping Roman Polak… But it was all in good fun.  And frankly, if anyone is strong enough to wrestle down the Polak Bear, tie him up and ship him to me, they can do it.  But I wish them much luck and a speedy recovery. Don’t get me wrong, I love a good swooning every once in a while, but taking it to the point where I watch hockey only for the ‘hotness factor’ will never come.  But I won’t lie, it does make for watching the interviews that much better…

Then I got even curiouser.  I have many female friends who love hockey.  I wanted to hear their stories… how they got into hockey, why they liked hockey, etc…  Here’s what my scientific research lead to:

I guess the speed & that it isn't boring like the other sports.. (football takes too long to line up really need to start doing so while the clock is going tho I can sometimes watch) Basketball I just don't like no idea why & Baseball well to me they’re a bunch of wusses. (Get a papercut & out for a week). Golf. Need I say Golf is like watching Paint dry? There's a lot more going on, on the ice & around than I think during other sports/games. Plus I loved the environment. The electricity in the air even tho it isn't a playoff game or any of importance.
-Kim Marie, NJ Devils Fan

I really liked it [figure skating], but quickly became enamored with hockey. Very fascinated by the player whose last name looked like "rabbit tail"... who was that?! Luc Robitaille!

In high school I finally started going to games. A neighbor of mine worked with Wayne Gretzky's race horses and gave my dad and I tickets to a game vs. the Sabres. Kings won 7-2, what a great time I had! And that season (92-93) the Kings did well & exceeded all expectations, moving on to the finals. If not for Marty McSorely's curved stick... who knows what could have happened? One very-cool experience I had was during the finals--my friend Hilary & I got up at 5am to go see the Stanley Cup on display at a nearby hotel. We got there & she, her dad, and I were the only ones there! I know that doesn't happen in Canada, ha! It was great, seeing all the trophies up close.
-Lisa, Boston Bruins Fan

I started being a hockey fan probably when I was like 7 or 8.  Growing up in Montreal, you have almost no choice of being a hockey fan as the city lives and breath hockey.  My dad would take me to go see the Montreal Canadiens Juniors, the farm team of the Montreal Canadiens back then.  I remember watching Pat Lafontaine playing for them.  Of course I started by being a Montreal Canadiens fan as I didn't know any better.
-Sandra, St Louis Blues Fan
When I was a sophomore in college, I became friendly with a classmate who was a die-hard New York Rangers fan and got seriously into hockey because of this person.  I started going to games, memorizing stats, collecting memorabilia, and occasionally meeting players. … I did enjoy collecting memorabilia though, and used to go to card shows pretty frequently on weekends.  I still have a few unusual pieces of memorabilia such as a set of Red Army cards, a Russian Penguins hat, an '85 Edmonton Oilers guide, etc. 
But what draws me more towards hockey is that aforementioned energy level, the speed, and complexity of the game.  There's so much going on all at once, which, for me, is part of the thrill….I appreciated -- and still appreciate -- hockey because it's energetic, engaging, and deliberate.  It's a very straight-to-the-point game which everyone can follow.  It's got action and athleticism, but also, a universal appeal.
-Krista,  NY Rangers Fan

So, as my scientific research proves, we’re not all about the looks.  I asked these ladies what they like about the game and what drew them into the game.  Not one of us said that the looks of the players drew us in.  We all were enamored by the speed and energy of the game.  But we all do have an occasional swooning moment.

See? We can like the game for the game.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

The Ducks Vs Lundqvist. Cause Frankly No One Else Showed Up.


As pictured above, the Rangers were afraid to touch the puck.  And when they did, it wasn't pretty. Passing pucks into the shins of the Ducks players, shooting wide (even in the shootout)...  Again, the Rangers had a slow and sloppy first period.  They seemed to be 5 steps behind the play.  Play got better as the time ticked down.  However, banking on EC scoring in the shootout proved fatal.

I've seen almost every shootout attempt by Erik Christensen.  And I don't recall a time that he ever shot the puck. Ever.  And he chooses to shoot. Wide.  I'm sure Tortorella is kicking himself. They sure could have used Avery to block Hiller with his nifty screening moves.  Or he could have skated circles around Hiller, praying on his recent bouts with vertigo.

The shoot out was miserable.  First EC goes wide, Richards fumbles the puck upon pick up...  The only two who had a decent shot was Zuccarello and Anisimov.  Lundqvist again, was almost stellar.

Again, penalties proved costly. A sloppy first period proved costly.  Being 2 steps behind the Ducks proved costly. 

The keys to the next couple games?  Stay out of the box, and don't rely on coming back in the 2nd and 3rd periods.  Because obviously that didn't work out so well.

The Three Stars of the game:

3. Lundqvist
2. Lundqvist
1. Lundqvist
 


Here are Lundqvist, Richards and Callahan on the game.

Hopefully a week from games will be good for them to regroup.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

On a Lighter Note...

Let's watch Brad Richards chat with Boomer & Carton for a hot minute.

Listen here

Just fantastic.  This is why Rangers fans should be proud.  About Richards, not Carton.

Sunday, September 4, 2011

The Off-Season: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

This off season has been filled with news, both good, bad and ugly.


The Good:
Free Agent Signings and Trades!
July is always an exciting time, for fans anyways.  Watching where the top free agents will be lured to is about as exciting as riding a roller coaster without a seatbelt.  White knuckles.
Being a NY Rangers fan, I was excited to see the team bring two FA's to the team; Mike Rupp and Brad Richards.  Both bring several seasons of experience and depth to the team, also adding an excess of centers to the team. Should be interesting.

JML to Toronto.  This is old news, I know, but still a painful one to say.  Just about as painful as watching Komisarek go to Toronto.

Christian Ehrhoff going from Vancouver to the Islanders to Buffalo in the span of 2 days.

Ales Kotalik going back to the Sabres. 



The Bad:
May 13, 2011: We all were witness to the internet chatter of the death of a great 'enforcer', a great teammate, Derek "Boogeyman" Boogaard.  Standing 6'7" and 265lb, it's hard to imagine someone of that stature being vulnerable.  But he is.  We all are.  His death was ruled as accidental, resulting from a deadly mix of alcohol and oxycodone.  His family agreed to donate his brain to The Sports Legacy Institute.

August 15, 2011:  Rick Rypien.  Known for his grittiness on the ice, and also known for his antics of grabbing at a fan while being escorted off the ice.  Again, it's hard to imagine someone that 'tough' being vulnerable.  After his untimely death, it was then discovered, at least to the public, that he had been battling depression. 

and the most recent, August 31, 2011: Wade Belak.  Ending his career with the Nashville Predators, he was not known for his scoring presence on the ice. In his 549 NHL games he had 8 goals. 1263 Penalty minutes.  He, like Rypien, was also battling depression.

What does this say about the NHL?  Are they paying more attention to the physical health of their players moreso than the mental health?    I browse the staffing on NHL teams, splattered with coaches, trainers, physicians, medical consultants, cardiologists, dentists... Does any team staff a psychiatrists or psychologists?  Would doing so help to identify problems before resulting in more sad headlines?  Maybe this is something the NHLPA and NHL should look into.

And The Ugly
I debated on this one between two options... The first was the moving of the Atlanta Thrashers moving to Winnipeg.  This is mainly because I am a huge Mark Stuart fan and just moved to Atlanta.  But then I was browsing the internet today and found something even worse, making me proud that I have never ever been an Islanders fan.

This cracks me up.  With all the uncertainty of the Islanders, why in the world would one ever get a logo tattooed?  For the record, I do have tattoos, so I'm not anti-tattoo.  Even though I'm a die hard Rangers fan, I don't think I could ever get the logo tattooed on me. Much less get a tattoo at a home game.  But when you're a team struggling to fill the 'Mausoleum' I'd be offering tattoos too.